Shah Alam · Measurement reviews for hiring apps

Sitespringhub

How candidates actually move from Apply to Offer

Hiring managers and a candidate seated at a long table during a face-to-face conversation

Tonight’s bill — the path we count

I Apply started on the phone or desktop, including the consent screen
II Application submitted, with CV attached or parsed
III Screening questions finished, not merely opened
IV Interview booked, then whether the candidate arrived
V Offer sent, accepted, or left unanswered

Sitespringhub sits with the people who run a recruitment or hiring app and reads the event trail those screens already produce. You receive a written findings pack, not a login to another product.

Request a measurement review

The work

A hiring app already records more than most teams read

Recruitment and hiring apps log taps, screen views, form fields, and booking confirmations whether anyone has named those events or not. Talent leads then report “applications this week” as if that figure described the whole path. It rarely does. People abandon a Bahasa Malaysia consent screen, stall on a CV parse that fails for PDF scans, or book an interview slot that the hiring manager never confirmed.

We take one apply-to-offer path at a time. We map which events you already capture, which names collide, and which stages your weekly report silently skips. The readout is a conversation over the live screens, then a pack you can hand to product and talent in the same meeting.

Flagship

Hiring-app measurement review

Ten working days from a complete data pack. Written findings plus a ninety-minute readout. From RM 8,400 for a single candidate path.

A hiring conversation across a wooden table, the kind of screen-to-offer path this review counts

Written findings pack and a ninety-minute readout

Hiring-app measurement review

One apply-to-offer path, mapped and counted. You leave with a findings pack the talent lead and the product owner can argue over in the same room.

Three colleagues leaning over a table during a working session

Live two-hour session

Candidate drop-off walkthrough

We open the live apply flow on the same kind of phone your candidates use and stop at every screen that leaks people, with the stage counts in hand.

Hands reviewing printed figures and a notebook at a desk

Written comparison plus a one-hour readout

Sourcing-channel comparison

A comparison of the sources your hiring app already tags, ranked by interviews that happened, not by the application pile each source claims.

A quiet office interior with long tables, the kind of room used for a monthly readout

Retainer hours, used on agreed dates

Monthly measurement hours

A standing eight-hour month for teams that already had a review and now change screens often enough that last quarter’s counts go stale.

See every review we run

A reviewer standing beside a whiteboard during a readout with a talent team

From a recent readout

The campus-hire app counted “screens” that were never finished

“We had been celebrating a jump in screening volume. Sitespringhub showed that most of those events fired when a graduate opened the question set, not when they answered the last item. The actual finish rate on Android was far lower, and that is where we spent the next sprint.”

Talent operations, graduate hiring app · Kuala Lumpur

Read client stories

From the journal

Notes from recent hiring-app reviews

People talking over a table in a busy room, closer to a talent meeting than to a volume chart

18 July 2026

Application volume is a poor weekly story

A rising application number can mean a louder job-board tag, a duplicate-submit bug, or an easier first screen — three very different situations for a talent lead.